Pillion – Movie Review

By Jason Osiason

I’m a huge fan of this one. Pillion is a tender, queer, love-at-first-sight entry on the ache of loving through submission, and I haven’t been able to shake it since the credits rolled.

Harry Lighton’s debut, adapted from Adam Mars-Jones’s novella Box Hill, pairs Harry Melling as Colin, a shy suburban traffic warden who still sings in a choir with his parents, and Alexander Skarsgard as Ray, the magnetic leader of a local biker club who takes Colin on as his submissive. That premise could have been played for shock or for pity. Lighton does neither. The film treats the dynamic between these two men with total sincerity and a surprising amount of warmth and humor, and it becomes something much rarer: a love story about a person discovering the exact shape of his own desire and having to decide whether to be ashamed of it.

Melling and Skarsgard together just surprisingly clicks? On paper it shouldn’t. One actor is all nervous, apologetic smallness, the other is pure looming confidence, and the movie turns that mismatch into the entire point. Skarsgard is doing quietly brilliant work, playing Ray’s dominance not as cruelty but as a kind of language, all withheld approval and precise instruction, while letting tiny flickers of care and cowardice slip through the leather. And Melling is the revelation. Watching Colin bloom inside a relationship most movies would frame as degrading, finding pride and purpose in service, polishing boots like it’s a calling, is some of the most delicate acting of the year. Two of the most wildly talented actors of their generation, meeting in the strangest and most generous material either has been handed.

The filmmaking stays intimate and unfussy, which is the right call. Lighton shoots the biker world with affection instead of anthropology, wringing real comedy out of the collision between kink protocol and polite British small talk, and the movie never once flinches into apology for what it’s depicting. The humor lands constantly, and then the film pivots, without warning, into genuine ache.

Then there’s the final sequence, which I genuinely cannot shake. I won’t spoil it, but the film builds to this uneasy relief of recognizing yourself in its final surrender, an ending that asks whether freedom means walking away from what you want or finally, fully admitting it. It hit me somewhere very deep, and it quietly reframes everything that came before it.

A love story about giving yourself away that somehow becomes a movie about self-possession. That’s the trick of it, and it’s a beautiful one. [A-]

Leave a comment